Texas cattle raisers support eminent domain reform
Senate Bill 740 was heard before the Senate State Affairs Committee two weeks ago Monday.
The bill, authored by Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, takes several steps to protect private property owners from …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Attention subscribers
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
Texas cattle raisers support eminent domain reform
Senate Bill 740 was heard before the Senate State Affairs Committee two weeks ago Monday.
The bill, authored by Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, takes several steps to protect private property owners from abuse in the eminent domain process whereby land is taken by private corporations and government entities for the “public good.”
Clayton Henry, a rancher from Wichita Falls, testified in favor of SB 740 on behalf of the Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association. Henry also serves on TSCRA’s board of directors and executive committee. In his testimony, he provided reasons for reform within the eminent domain process.
“Private law abiding citizens should not emerge from the eminent domain process battered, bruised and financially poorer by the deeds of condemnors who are acting as agents of the State of Texas,” said Henry in his testimony before the Senate State Affairs Committee.
Other ranchers, landowners and TSCRA members also testified in favor of the bill. Karen Thorpe of Winters and Reed Stewart of Sterling City both gave telling accounts of their own battles with eminent domain condemnors. In Thorpe’s case, high voltage power lines were set to run directly over their house, but ultimately were built over their family cemetery. Stewart’s experience entailed a condemnor who filed a restraining order against him on his own property.